Der Zyklus interview for Superfly magazine (2004).
This interview was kindly sent to me by Andrea Benedetti, who interviewed Heinrich Mueller about Der Zyklus' Biometry album in 2004 for the Italian print magazine, Superfly.
Why
do you choose byometrical identification as the leading topic of this
new album?
We now
live in precarious times, terrorism and other forms of malignant acts
are rampant in global society. Biometric technology will become
ever more ubiquitous as a fundamental security measure across
the world. Its presence and importance cannot be ignored, this is what
prompted the integration of electronic music and biometry. Biometry
influenced the development of this project.
Do
you have a positive approach about technology applied to every day
life or do you feel that there is a dark side of the thing (control
of the masses, less humanity)?
I am neutral in this regard. Technology is just what it is, tools created by man to enhance his very existence. It is neither evil or good, it only does what its human masters wish for it to do. Humans can make rational decisions and choices,machinery cannot do this just yet, even though artificial intellects are very advanced at this time and breakthroughs in this field are being made we are still some distance from this as of now. The masses are controlled because they allow themselves to be controlled, most people do not think profoundly and let a handful of others do this for them. Their political leaders.
Which are the artists you like more in the past? And now?
I am neutral in this regard. Technology is just what it is, tools created by man to enhance his very existence. It is neither evil or good, it only does what its human masters wish for it to do. Humans can make rational decisions and choices,machinery cannot do this just yet, even though artificial intellects are very advanced at this time and breakthroughs in this field are being made we are still some distance from this as of now. The masses are controlled because they allow themselves to be controlled, most people do not think profoundly and let a handful of others do this for them. Their political leaders.
Listening
to this last work, I've felt a more digital approach than in the
past. I mean less analogical gears (or anyway 'classical' synth/drum
machines) and more virtual synth and dsp. Is it true? If yes why this
change? A new musical direction for your music?
One
should never rely on one type of method in order to create, if so
stagnation and repetition will
gradually take root and limit growth. The operational aspects of
a device is immaterial,
it's the end product. People place too much emphasis on particulars of
the production
procedure, when in reality they should be focused on the result of
this process.
In
my opinion this album is more focused on atmosphere and sounds than
on melodies and rhythm like you did in in your previous works. Do you
agree? Is it a special approach only for this album or do you
continue to produce material like this?
Every
project should have its own characteristics. The approach and outcome
should always
be different. If ones uses the same technique every-time, results
become predictable
and the element of uniqueness is muted. A new set of conditions must be
in place for each project. Everyone has his or her own definition of
rhythm and melodic structure.
One may say percussion is rhythm and the other may say time delay reflections are
rhythm. It's all individual interpretation.
Can
you explain better your collaboration for this album with the company
Byometric Group in Germany?
It
was not really a collaboration in a technical sense. It was only an
act of courtesy on their behalf
in allowing us to collect imagery for the concept. That was the
extent of their involvement.
Why
did you choose the name Der Zyklus?
The
concept of a cycle or periodic motion is fascinating,
repetition, repeat a sequence of operations time and time again
has a certain charm.
The
scientist has been always an important figure in your music. Why?
We
use the scientific method in our work, hypothesis-theory,
experimentation, conclusion. The
scientific image is more than ornamentation it's how we function. If
test results are in accord
with theoretical projections it becomes fact, if the opposite
occurs we disgard or
reconfigure the theory.
Which
is your favourite scientist ever and why?
There
is no favourite, many men and women have contributed to human
progress. They are all important for their contributions.
Which are the artists you like more in the past? And now?
There
have been many interesting developments from all eras so there is not
a particular time
point which is more interesting than the other but I will say that
integrity today is a rarer find than in the past and this in turn has
a tremendous impact on the music itself.
It's
a long time you don't make a live act. Why? There will be new
performances in the next future?
This
requires extensive preparation and forethought but we will see
what the future holds.
After
almost twenty years do you think that techno has made its 'revolution
for change' ?
If
innovation is the prime directive the revolution will never have
closure and it will remain a continuum but if stagnation and backwardness grip the form you can
confidently say that its
revolutionary intent has come to pass.The concept of a Golden Age is
when there is a period
of highly advanced research and breakthroughs, this age can sustain
indefinitely as long as people are pushing the boundaries of scientific theory
and these theories materialise into
something practical.
1 Comments:
:)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home